| RAW Data | |||||
|
Wed, 23 Jan 2008
Wed, 02 Jan 2008
But of course, we have no idea of what this music sounded like or how the text of the Psalms was set to music. The obvious conclusion from this is that God simply did not regard the form or style of music as important. But that they are meant for music is perhaps much more important than most churches think today. So the next question is how do we go about setting the text of the Psalm to music today? Part of this question involves the importance of being faithful to the text. Because when you try to put the Psalms to a metered style of music (with a strict time signature), you immediately have trouble. So many composers alter the text and paraphrase it. Or just use fragments of a Psalm. Now this can be good and useful but there is still the need to set complete Psalms in exact wording to music. One way to do this is to use chant. This may not sound very appealing to many of my church going friends but don't dismiss it without good consideration. One of the resources in our class was a book published by Concordia Publishing here in St. Louis, Reading the Psalms with Luther. This book primarily provides some good insights into the meaning and purpose of each Psalm. But it also has these 8 chant (listed below) tones and each Psalm is pointed in a manner that allows you to chant each Psalm using one of the tones. These tones are fairly simple. And since there are no suggestions as to which tone will go with any particular Psalm, I decided to try and help with selecting a tone by giving a brief analysis. Thanks also to my interest in the Lilypond music typesetting program, I am able to share my thoughts and the tones with everyone. I have highlighted words and phrases so you can quickly determine the character of each tone. So by printing this out and going through the Luther's book, you can hopefully more easily determine which tone might work for a particular Psalm. Without the book it's a little more tricky as it adds the points where you change from the sustained tones. I suppose you could try to do this yourself but for the novice, this might be difficult. This tone is in D major. Both halves seem to clearly establish the D major chord. It is resolved and does not exhibit any tension when I hear it. Good for expressing absolutes. This tone has the F major key signature and repeats the note F but to me, it does not sound completely major. The first half actually seems to outline the dissonant locrian mode and, although it doesn't include the diminished 5th (which would be B flat), it still sounds minor. The second half of the tone ends on F and seems to have a more major and resolving sound. This is an interesting tone and could be used effectively in an antiphonal style with a couple of groups of singers. It seems to have a question and answer character to it. This tone seems to be in the phyrigian mode which is minor but it doesn't sound very minor to me. It is perhaps semi-reflective in character. E flat major and another tone which outlines the tonic chord of the key. A very resolved and finished sound, it seems useful to me for expressing absolutes and praise. G major. But this tone clearly moves from G to D, thus ending on more of a mixolydian or dominant chord type of sound. So it is a major tone which does not have the fully resolved sound of the others. It has more of a questioning feel. D major key but another phyrgian mode tone (which is minor), this time built on F sharp. Yet it doesn't sound overly minor or sad. It is kind of in between reflective and declarative in it's possible use. F major key but clearly the minor sounding dorian mode (built on G). Lonely and reflective sounding. A minor. But it seems to shift from A minor in the first half to D dorian in the second. This tone has a kind of anguished and lonely feel to me.[/music] 10 comments permalink
UpdateHere's a few more detailed notes on how TTUSB works with the Audacity software. I have digitized a couple of records now and it has been an easy process. As far as getting a good level, this was not a factor as Audacity seems to get a decent recording level automatically. The sample is initially stored in Audacity's native format. From here you can now begin touching up the audio sample. Audacity will display the whole sample in a graphic format that you can visually inspect. Almost all pop's and scratches are visible and look obviously different from the audio of the actual performance. You can use the selection and zoom tools to inspect these. There are two plugins that I have been using so far to touch up the recordings. The pop filter has threshold and width settings and fiddling with these has given some good results.Sometimes, there are other types of vinyl artifacts that the pop filter will not get. There is a repair plugin that works quite well on these. You have to use the zoom tool and isolate the artifact very precisely. The repair plugin seems to use some kind of interpolation to smooth out the wave form in between the end points. So far, this tool works excellently and I have been able to eliminate some hiss and scratch type things from the recordings. As far as selecting tracks, I am doing this visually. I check the time of a track and scroll through the display to find it. Then select the whole track. I don't see any kind of automated way to do this but I actually haven't looked very closely to see if there is. Perhaps because I am picky enough that I want to do it all precisely with my own eyes and ears. There is an export selection item on the file menu that allows you to save to whatever format you desire. I have been saving to WMA which I can then convert to Ogg or MP3 at a later time. Many of the recordings I have are not re-released on CD so I don't think there is any information available from CDDB. But I haven't really looked into this. I don't see anything within Audacity in this regard. As you can imagine, there can be a significant amount of time involved with selecting and refining all the tracks from an LP. This can depend on several factors. How picky you want to be with eliminating noise, pops, and hiss as well as what kind of shape the recordings are on are the most obvious factors. Mon, 24 Dec 2007
Hope everyone has a great Christmas! Wed, 19 Dec 2007
Tue, 11 Dec 2007
This nice bio has some interesting references to Bach's encounters with Calvinists and Pietists in Germany. It mentions how both were disinterested in liturgy and the Lutheran approach to music. It is interesting how social (and other forces) come together at just the right time and place to help produce the musical geniuses of particular times. Just think if Bach were not born a Lutheran, what would his music be like (if he even became a musician)? Fri, 30 Nov 2007
A couple of new songs were added which, I think, are from the new Christmas CD which was released this year. All tunes are stretched, extended, jazzed up, and jammed out, compared to the recordings. In short, these guys just let loose and kick out the music when they play live and you just will not get a flavor of it from the recordings (although the Stars and Promises Alive recording does get you in the ball park). I think my favorite song of the night was the last one before the encores. It is a delta blues version of Go Tell it on the Mountain and each year I think they extend it and slow down the tempo more than the past. Peter's slide guitar soloing on this is just something that is hard to put into words. Maybe other worldly might do. It's just wild and this tune in itself is worth the price of admission. He also seems to add something new to the slew of guitars that he uses every year. This time it was a single pickup, hollow body, f hole style jazz guitar which was used for the solo on one of the tunes. It worked well although the sound of this guitar through the system could have been dialed in a bit better I think. And speaking of the sound, the main issue was that Maggie Estes violin was just too soft and I could barely hear her playing on the first couple of songs. But it did improve as the sound engineer worked on it. Maggie is the 17 year old violin (and occasional mandolin) player who joined the group last year. She has a very smooth and sweet, understated style of soloing which is enjoyable to hear and mixes will with the songs. In short, she shows maturity in her musicianship which is well beyond her years. Chris Walters on keyboard is a most excellent addition to the group this year. At times I had to look twice to make sure it wasn't Bruce Hornsby playing on some of the tunes. His soloing is just awesome and he adds quite a bit to every single song that he plays on. Chris was a guest to the St. Louis concert two years ago. This year he is in for the full tour. You guys are in for a treat in other cities if you go to see the show. The sound of the night that I liked the most and which sounded the least electronic to me was the flute work of Mark Holland. Check out Mark's group web site, www.Autumnschild.com and listen to some of the videos. They also have a Christmas CD out that sounds most excellent. Mark comes with about a dozen different Native American flutes. He gets a phenomenal range of sounds out of these. Everything from a kind of Japanese Shakuhachi sound to interesting bird like imitations as well as just beautiful melodies played in a variety of ranges. All the others in the group deserve mention of course. Mark Torlina's base work and Scott Bryan's percussion provides a solid and soulful foundation to the music. So next year, some of you guys who visit this blog need to plan on coming with us. I hope I have whetted your appetite! Tue, 20 Nov 2007
This music has a much different sound than we are used to these days. It is gentle and the way the men sang in harmony is quite nice. Fullerton also had lots of stories to tell as well as his performances. Some of the songs he sang by playing a recording with himself singing the harmonies in the background. This worked fairly well. One song that I know I have heard before (and probably many people have) was Ghost Riders in the Sky. Fullerton told the story of how this song came to be written. It was inspired by the guy being out in a thunderstorm and being scared by an old Indian who told him to watch out for the ghost riders. I remember watching Roy Rogers episodes on TV when I was very young. I suppose these were re-runs as I don't remember when they were made. But for a while as I grew I up, I went through a very dedicated cowboy phase (which was followed by a much longer army phase). I know I had some cap guns but I don't remember if they were specifically Roy Rogers branded. Fullerton mentioned that these are worth quite a bit of money these days. Fri, 16 Nov 2007
This particular piece is off of the, "Selling England by the Pound" LP. I always enjoyed the way these guys play. Not a lot of flashy display but taken together they are a tour de force of progressive rock. Steve Hackett, the guitarist, plays so nice. In the middle of this video the camera focuses on him and you can see some of the techniques that he pioneered. A form of two handed tapping which he uses here became a mainstay of metal guitarists in the 80s. The smooth and sweet approach of Hackett almost makes me want to play electric guitar again. There are so many changes in this piece. Tempo, rhythm, pace, modulations, it's really very musical. As to the lyrics, I never really understood much of what Gabriel was trying to say. But that is par for the course during this time of progressive rock. For me it just added to the mystery. This song seems to be kind of satirical. Wikipedia has a brief entry on the song and a little googling revealed this more detailed analysis. Hackett and Gabriel were invited to tour with the group this past year but apparently their schedules wouldn't allow it. I hope they will consider it again in the near future. Seeing this original form of the group would be a real treat. Mon, 10 Sep 2007
Thu, 06 Sep 2007
Tue, 04 Sep 2007
There must have been about 120 people there. I was surprised that people were quiet and seemed to be listening. Well this was encouraging and I really feel that the music fit pretty well. I played mostly Baroque music with a few Renaissance tunes thrown it. These were mostly in the major keys. All in all it was a fun event. I think I will try to work up more wedding music and try to make myself available to do this more if I can. Thu, 16 Aug 2007
I am really amazed at how many resources the Internet (and Youtube) gives to guitarists today. You can expose yourself to so much more variety than when I was a student back in the mid 70's. Even if we just limit the discussion to classical guitar. If I want to hear how a particular piece is played, I just search Youtube and I can pull up several recordings of the piece by both amateurs and pros. It's very helpful to see and hear how people are doing things. Will this translate into better performing guitarists in the future? Maybe so. There is certainly more opportunity to improve and understand the techniques involved but will it produce more heart and soul? This might be hard to say for sure. |
![]() Ultimate Ron Paul Daily Paul Ron Paul Book Bomb
About RAW Data, Bobber's Web log. RAW Data (Bobber) Interview How much daily? CTTE (read, listen, and sing) Bobber's latest Del.icio.us links:
2008-07-05
2008-07-04
2008-07-03
2008-07-02
Contact Me: Music Sites Guitar Builders and Luthiers
Running
Frequented National Blogs Internal Columnists (political) Columnists (technical) Health and Nutrition Big Shark Team Cyclists Other Cyclists Health Care Reform Paleo (Hunter Gatherer) Diet (and related diets) Christianity Historic Christian Confessions Classical Education Routed Slot Car Tracks Training With Power Cycling Digital Cameras Sporting Goods and Bike Shops Technical Transcendent Music Utilities |
||||